Evaluation of smut resistance in selected sugarcane genotypes and their molecular characterization using SCoT, ISSR, and RAPD analysis

Authors

  • Sayed H. Agag Maize and Sugar Crops Diseases Research Department, Plant Pathology Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt
  • Abeer H. Abbas Maize and Sugar Crops Diseases Research Department, Plant Pathology Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18698633

Keywords:

Sugarcane, whip smut, Sporisorium scitamineum, molecular markers, SCoT, ISSR, RAPD

Abstract

Sporisorium scitamineum causes sugarcane smut, which is a global problem that seriously reduces yield and quality. The disease is most effectively managed through the use of resistant cultivars. Molecular markers can support breeding programs by helping to identify resistant genotypes at early stages. In this study, three sugarcane varieties G.2003-47 (G3), G.2004-27 (G4), and the commercial cultivar G.T.54-9 (C9) were evaluated for whip smut response under artificial inoculation and characterized using Start codon Targeted (SCoT), inter simple sequence repeats (ISSR), and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. Disease incidence was lowest in G.2004-27 (4%), while G.2003-47 and G.T.54-9 showed higher infection levels (13.34% and 12.88%, respectively). SCoT primers generated 25 bands with 55.33% polymorphism, whereas ISSR and RAPD produced 37 and 32 bands with polymorphism levels of 46.3% and 49%, respectively. Several primers across the three marker systems distinguished the relatively resistant variety G.2004-27 from the more susceptible genotypes. These findings indicate that SCoT, ISSR, and RAPD markers can complement phenotypic screening and assist in the preliminary identification of whip smut–resistant sugarcane clones for further field evaluation. Consequently, the variety G.2004-27 is recommended as a promising source of resistance for Egyptian sugarcane breeding programs. Additionally, SCoT markers proved to be more informative than RAPD and ISSR in discriminating among the tested genotypes.

References

Albert, H. H., & Schenck, S. (1996). Genetic diversity of Ustilago scitaminea revealed by molecular markers. Phytopathology, 86, 129–134.

Bhuiyan, S. A., Croft, B. J., & Cox, M. C. (2021). Sugarcane smut: Global status, epidemiology and management. Phytopathology, 111(11), 1925–1938.

Braithwaite, K. S., Croft, B. J., & Magarey, R. C. (2004). Genetic variation in a worldwide collection of the sugarcane smut fungus Ustilago scitaminea. Plant Pathology, 53(2), 220–230.

Collard, B. C. Y., & Mackill, D. J. (2009). Marker-assisted selection: An approach for precision plant breeding in the twenty-first century. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1491), 557–572.

Comstock, J. C. (2000). Smut. In P. Rott, R. Bailey, J. C. Comstock, B. J. Croft, & A. S. Saumtally (Eds.), A guide to sugarcane diseases (pp. 181–185). CIRAD/ISSCT.

Comstock, J. C., Ferreira, S. A., & Wu, K. K. (1983). Incidence of sugarcane smut in Hawaii. Plant Disease, 67, 452–454.

Council of Sugar Crops. (2024). Annual report for sugar crops in Egypt. Ministry of Agriculture and Land Reclamation.

Croft, B. J., Berding, N., Cox, M. C., & Bhuiyan, S. A. (2008a). Breeding smut-resistant sugarcane varieties in Australia: Progress and future directions. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, 30, 125–134.

Croft, B. J., & Braithwaite, K. S. (2006). Management of an incursion of sugarcane smut in Australia. Australasian Plant Pathology, 35, 113–122.

Croft, B. J., Magarey, R. C., Allsopp, P. G., Cox, M. C., Willcox, T. G., Milford, B. J., & Wallis, E. S. (2008b). Sugarcane smut in Queensland: Arrival and emergency response. Australasian Plant Pathology, 37, 26–34.

Fawcett, G. L. (1946). Departamento de Botánica y Fitopatología. Memoria anual del año 1945. Revista Industrial y Agrícola de Tucumán, 36, 159–166.

Firehun, Y., Abera, T., Yohannes, Z., & Leul, M. (2009). Handbook of sugarcane pest management in Ethiopia. Ethiopia Sugar Development Agency Research Directorate.

Gillaspie, A. G., Mock, R. G., & Dean, J. L. (1983). Differentiation of Ustilago scitaminea isolates in greenhouse tests. Plant Disease, 67, 373–375.

Hoy, J. W., Hollier, C. A., Fontenot, D. B., & Grelen, L. B. (1986). Incidence of sugarcane smut in Louisiana and its effect on yield. Plant Disease, 70, 59–60.

Ng, W. L., & Tan, S. G. (2015). Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers: Are we doing it right? ASM Science Journal, 9(1), 30–39.

Osman, M. A., Hesham, M. A., Elfarash, A., & Abo-Elyousr, K. A. (2025). Evaluation of fungicides for the control of sugarcane smut disease caused by Sporisorium scitamineum. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 58(18), 1010–1020.

Que, Y., Xu, L., Lin, J., Chen, R., Grisham, M. P., & Xu, S. (2012). Molecular variation of Sporisorium scitamineum populations in mainland China. Plant Disease, 96(10), 1529–1536.

Rott, P., Bailey, A., Comstock, J. C., & Croft, B. J. (2000). Whip smut of sugarcane. In P. Rott, R. Bailey, J. C. Comstock, B. J. Croft, & A. S. Saumtally (Eds.), A guide to sugarcane diseases (pp. 339–341). CIRAD/ISSCT.

Wei, X., Jackson, P. A., McIntyre, C. L., & Cox, M. C. (2006). Identification of molecular markers associated with smut resistance in sugarcane. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 113, 1149–1157.

Published

2026-02-02

Issue

Section

Research Articles

ARK

How to Cite

Evaluation of smut resistance in selected sugarcane genotypes and their molecular characterization using SCoT, ISSR, and RAPD analysis. (2026). Journal of Phytopathology and Disease Management, 13(1), 18698633. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18698633

Similar Articles

11-20 of 23

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.